Man's/Woman's Pippichic Shoes 822162 Black 36 Easy to use Trendy Elegant and stable packaging
Heel Jessica Simpson Rusley Black Luxe Kid Suede,Louise Et Cie Nadia Suede Pump Navy Women Sz 10 B 2530,Pin Up Couture Women's Smitten 10 White/Black Patent Leather Heels,Who What Wear Women's Shoes Sz 8 Taeget Sydney Satin Pink Platform Wedding Heel,NIB $180 Dolce Vita Lain Block Heel Sandal - Black - Sz 8,Bella Vita Womens 50-7422 Leather Pointed Toe Classic Pumps,Re-Mix Classic Vintage Footwear- Rita 2 Size 7.5 In Ivory Heels Pinup Shoes,Pleaser Bordello Women's Teeze-06 Pump Black Patent 11 M US
Easy Street Women's Passion Red Patent Pumps,Dyeables 53616 Chloe womens sandals, Black Shimmer,Man/Woman Pleaser ALLURE-609 Elegant appearance Stylish and charming Fashion versatile shoes
LADIES VAN DAL WHITE TAMPA SMART QUALITY LEATHER OPEN TOE SLIP ON WEDGE SHOES,Sexy Luxurous Stiletto black leather Sandals Gianrico Mori sz 41 Heels 15 cm,Tod's Gray Leather & Suede Bow Pumps SZ 39.5
Classiques Entire 205372 Gray Perforated Leather Strappy Sandals Shoes Sz. 9.5 M,Sarto by Franco Sarto Women's Abbington Ankle Strap Pump Dark Sand Suede Size
KG By Kurt Geiger Metallic Leather Eleanor Platform High Heels Sz 40 Snake Print,Alegria Romi Women's Sandal, Black Burnish, Size 8.0 762N
Elizabeth and James black leather stiletto heel pumps womens Sz 6.5B,Yves Saint Laurent Black Brown Cow Print Heeled Flat Size 7 Slip On Shoe,SCHUTZ Black Blasiana Leather Bow Pumps Size: 6.5,Imagine Vince Camuto Oya Women's Copper Satin Mary Jane d'Orsay Pumps Size 9 M,MG35 Helenah Cross Strap Peep Toe Platform Heels 551, Red, 9 US,Nina Carolyn Ruched Peep Toe Dress Heels, Black, 7.5 US / 38 EU,VINCE CAMUTO JAZELLE PERFORATED SUEDE PLATFORM SANDAL SIZE 7.5 CURRANT,Charles Jourdan Silver & Black Satin Bow Elegant Evening Pumps Heels Sz 7.5,Dolce Vita Trinity Womens Zebra Platform Heels Shoes size 6 Leather Pump Sale,NEW Anthropologie Lien Do Pewter Crackle Suede Ankle Tassel Tie Pump 2.5 Heel 10,Trotters Womens Kiera Closed Toe Classic Pumps,
By Radostina Pavlova
Amendments of the Law on the Asylum and Refugees (LAR), published in the State Gazette on 16.10.2015, grant the State Agency for the Refugees (SAR) the power to place asylum seekers in closed centres. Currently, the Registration and Reception Centres (RCC), managed by the SAR, have an open regime of entry and exit. The new law also enables the Chair of the SAR to determine zones on the territory of the country, which asylum seekers may not leave without permission.
At the moment, there are six open camps (RCC) functioning on the territory of the country: three in the region of Sofia (in the neighbourhoods of Vrazhdebna, Voenna Rampa and Ovcha Kupel) and one in each of the village of Banya near Nova Zagora, the village of Pastrogor and the town of Harmanli. The centre in Harmanli is the largest, with a capacity of 2710 places. The total capacity of the six centres is 5130 places. According to the SAR, as of the end of September, 2015, the centres were full to just about 50% of their total capacity. This is not due to a decrease in the flow of people, seeking asylum in Bulgaria, as their number from the beginning of the year up to the end of August, nearly 11,500, according to the SAR, exceeds significantly the number for the corresponding periods in previous years; it is, rather, the result of the trend of more and more of the registered asylum seekers, placed in the open centres, to leave Bulgaria before the completion of their asylum procedures.
| Condition: |
New without box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) that is not in original packaging or ... Read moreabout the condition
| US Shoe Size (Women's): ||9|
| Country/Region of Manufacture: ||Austria|| Material: ||Leather|
| Fastening: ||Buckle|| Brand: ||Paul Green|
| Heel Height: ||High (3 in. to 4.5 in.)|| Style: ||Slingback/Platform|
| Heel Type: ||Block|| Gender: ||Women|
| Color: ||Metallic/Champagne|| Shoe Type: ||Heels|
| Width: ||Medium (B, M)|| UPC: ||Does not apply|
The bill introducing these restrictions of the freedom of movement of asylum seekers in Bulgaria transposes into Bulgarian legislation two European directives: Directive 2011/95/EU on standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection
(the Qualification Directive) and Directive 2013/33/EU laying down standards for the reception of applicants for international protection
(the Reception Conditions Directive). According to the provisions of EU law, which Bulgaria must respect, the fact that a person has asked for international protection is not sufficient grounds for restricting his or her freedom and placing him or her in a closed centre. On the other hand, the Reception Conditions Directive allows the detention of asylum seekers, but only when this is necessary as a measure of last resort in exceptional circumstances, while providing a number of legal guarantees of the rights of the detainee. It is also allowed to create zones of movement as the newly adopted Bulgarian law does, but this is only a possibility, not a requirement. Similarly, EU law allows, but does not require the detention of asylum seekers in closed centres. EU Member States are always free to provide more favourable reception conditions to asylum seekers than the minimum standards set by European law.
Even though the adopted provisions do not, on their face, contradict the requirements of EU law, there is a risk for them to be applied arbitrarily by the state authorities wanting to have control over the asylum seekers in Bulgaria. For example, the decision that it is in the interest of public order for somebody to be placed in a closed centre as a matter of prevention – i.e., when he or she has not committed an infraction of public order – is left entirely to the discretion of the respective official. These broad discretionary powers represent a serious risk factor for corruption. Regarding zones of movement, their introduction in a relatively small country like Bulgaria, which, unlike Germany, has a centralized model of government, and in which economic opportunities are concentrated in several big cities, appears unjustified, especially considering that the same bill aims at helping asylum seekers participate in the labour market by giving them the right to work after three months from the beginning of their asylum procedure.