Nine West Womens Scheila Pointed Toe Classic Pumps Grey Size 8.5 V5pq,Stuart Weitzman Black Satin Formal Dress Heels Classics Pumps Shoes Womens 7 AA,Sexy UV Reactive Lightning Pink Bolts Platform 8" High Heel Stripper ShoesSexy Platform Womens Sequins Ankle Strap Super High Heel Bar Evening Sandal Shoe,Womens 4 Straps Black Platform Hollow Chunky High Heels Shoes Clubwear British U,Tommy Girl Brown Women's Shoes Wedge Platform Size 6 Style TG09286 Slide On,Mootsie Tootsies Beige Faux Leather Classic Slip On Pumps Size 9.5M,Nickels Soft Womens Leather Slip on Kitten Heel Size 7.5 M Black Horse Bit,PLEASER Sexy Cork Platform Wedges 6 1/2" Heels Slip On Exotic Shoes BEAU601/C/CK,Fashion Womens Roman Mixed Color High Heels Sandals Pumps Peep Toes Club Shoes,Women's Crocs Size 8 Wedge Heels Mules Brown Rubber Fleece Lined Very GoodPleaser MOON-728 Women's Black White Patent Cut-Out Platform Wrap Heels Sandals,Matte Patent Leather Black Wedge Pumps w/Ankle Strap,Elegant Womens Velvet Block High Heel Pointy Toe Party Pump Wedding Shoes Hot,Vogue Womens Rhinestones Pointed Toe Stilettos High Heel Pumps Shoes Clubwear,Paco Gil Multi Color Canvas STRIPE Peep-toe Espadrille Wedge NEW,Escarpins Marc Jacobs Velours noir Taille 40LADIES ANNE MICHELLE " L2829 " BLACK SATIN COURT SHOES,N1 Artesania Diego Espadrilles Hand Made In Spain Size 38 Beige Sling Back,Ana Roman 16314 Womens Premium Lightweight Leather Wedges/Shoes Made In Spain,Lucky Brand Womens Lk-Jemya Rosewood Heels Size 6 (397654),Womens Flats Sneakers Low Tops Skateboard Pull On Round Toe Canvas Shoes C18 hotBandolino Womens 8M Heels Black Leather Single Strap Kitten Heel Patent Leather,Gentleman/Lady Heel Nine West Jantine Black/Black Modern technology delicate business,06156 Jessica Green Strappy Slingback Sandal Women’s Heel Shoe US 6,Gentleman/Lady JENNA-09 Strong heat and wear resistance the most economical Preferred boutique,CUTE BLACK DESIGNER PAPRIKA HIGH HEELS SIZE 8 WOMENS SHOES,Womens High heels Stilettos Peep Toes Sexy Nightclub Pumps Platform Shoes Chic,Gianni Bini Saydie Womens Dark Sepia D’Orsay Platform Pump,Men's/Women's Escarpins Lanvin t.39, neuves Easy to clean surface Orders are welcome Fine wild,

   

By Radostina Pavlova

Amendments of the Law on the Asylum and Refugees (LAR), published in the State Gazette on 16.10.2015, grant the State Agency for the Refugees (SAR) the power to place asylum seekers in closed centres. Currently, the Registration and Reception Centres (RCC), managed by the SAR, have an open regime of entry and exit. The new law also enables the Chair of the SAR to determine zones on the territory of the country, which asylum seekers may not leave without permission.

At the moment, there are six open camps (RCC) functioning on the territory of the country: three in the region of Sofia (in the neighbourhoods of Vrazhdebna, Voenna Rampa and Ovcha Kupel) and one in each of the village of Banya near Nova Zagora, the village of Pastrogor and the town of Harmanli. The centre in Harmanli is the largest, with a capacity of 2710 places. The total capacity of the six centres is 5130 places. According to the SAR, as of the end of September, 2015, the centres were full to just about 50% of their total capacity. This is not due to a decrease in the flow of people, seeking asylum in Bulgaria, as their number from the beginning of the year up to the end of August, nearly 11,500, according to the SAR, exceeds significantly the number for the corresponding periods in previous years; it is, rather, the result of the trend of more and more of the registered asylum seekers, placed in the open centres, to leave Bulgaria before the completion of their asylum procedures.

Item specifics

Condition:
New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
Style: Court Shoes
Brand: Spot On Color 1: Various
Width: Various US Shoe Size (Women's) 1: Various size
Fastening: Slip On
The bill introducing these restrictions of the freedom of movement of asylum seekers in Bulgaria transposes into Bulgarian legislation two European directives: Directive 2011/95/EU on standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection (the Qualification Directive) and Directive 2013/33/EU laying down standards for the reception of applicants for international protection (the Reception Conditions Directive). According to the provisions of EU law, which Bulgaria must respect, the fact that a person has asked for international protection is not sufficient grounds for restricting his or her freedom and placing him or her in a closed centre. On the other hand, the Reception Conditions Directive allows the detention of asylum seekers, but only when this is necessary as a measure of last resort in exceptional circumstances, while providing a number of legal guarantees of the rights of the detainee. It is also allowed to create zones of movement as the newly adopted Bulgarian law does, but this is only a possibility, not a requirement. Similarly, EU law allows, but does not require the detention of asylum seekers in closed centres. EU Member States are always free to provide more favourable reception conditions to asylum seekers than the minimum standards set by European law.

Even though the adopted provisions do not, on their face, contradict the requirements of EU law, there is a risk for them to be applied arbitrarily by the state authorities wanting to have control over the asylum seekers in Bulgaria. For example, the decision that it is in the interest of public order for somebody to be placed in a closed centre as a matter of prevention – i.e., when he or she has not committed an infraction of public order – is left entirely to the discretion of the respective official. These broad discretionary powers represent a serious risk factor for corruption. Regarding zones of movement, their introduction in a relatively small country like Bulgaria, which, unlike Germany, has a centralized model of government, and in which economic opportunities are concentrated in several big cities, appears unjustified, especially considering that the same bill aims at helping asylum seekers participate in the labour market by giving them the right to work after three months from the beginning of their asylum procedure.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply