New Clarks Mint Treat Gore-Tex Leather Boots Size 5.5 D
Irregular Choice Ascot Purple Black Womens Heels Court Shoes,NEW Dolce & Gabbana suede black pumps with gold insole,REDUCED!NEW Lucy Choi Sexy Ladies Glitter Heels shoes Size 38 (5) Brand RRP
womens shoes EDDY DANIELE 4 () sandals grey black leather swarovski AW682,Irregular Choice Mrs Lower Womens High Heel Wedding Party Court Shoes Size,LANVIN Shoes Size 6.5 - 36.5 Black Suede Wedge Ankle Strap Buckle EXC Condition,ICONE FOOTWEAR WOMAN DECOLLETE CHAMOIS BLACK - 4523,Gentlemen/Ladies Job lot ladies shoes Good world reputation Beautiful Extreme speed logistics,Man/Woman Saint Laurent Shoes in Great Condition Queensland Elegant and sturdy packaging cheap price
Man's/Woman's UNIF STAX PLATFORMS 3 Clever and practical Has a long reputation Direct business,Gabor Womens Sovereign Black Patent Slip On Court Shoes 72.052.87 5 UK,MIU MIU PATENT LEATHER HEELS SHOES SIZE: /
Christian Louboutin Purple Suede Drapadita 140mm Platform Peep Toe Pumps,JIMMY CHOO MALIKA SHOES BOOTIE 2013 CRUISE COLLECTION MIRROR LEATHER,Via Roma 15 black stretch fabric ankle boot,Man's/Woman's prada unworn Sandals Size 38 Many styles Known for its good quality Caramel, gentle,CINTI Womens C33-09 T-Bar Heels Multicolour (Bronzo\argento 726) 5 UK,ICONE FOOTWEAR WOMAN DECOLLETE VARNISH LIGHT BROWN - 1317,Vionic Orthotic Rest Bella Casual Thongs Sandals - Denim,Christian louboutin Sling Back- Pony hair Leopard Print size 39.5,GIUSEPPE ZANOTTI Coline Cutout Suede Mules, EU39.5/ UK6.5 (Fits small), RRP€750,Ladies Party Shoes Peep Toe Sandals Slingbacks Ankle Buckle Chunky Heel,WITH DISCOUNT NOW! NEW Casadei Kitten heel Leather Pumps Court shoes Bright Lobs,Orla Kiely Clarks Dilly Ox Blood Shoes Size 3,,Genuine Jimmy Choo Vida Shoes Spotted Leather Natural/Gold,Irregular Choice Carnival Kiss Womens Court Shoes Black Gold Size 4-8,Giasco K7061D40 Low Shoe, Derby, O2, Size US: 6.5/Size UK: 40, Black,Lauren by Ralph Lauren Aleena Platform Sandals, Blue, 3.5 UK,PINKO WOMAN GLADIATOR SANDAL SHOES HIGH HEELS SUEDE CODE 1P20RP.Y2CQ NICHEL
By Radostina Pavlova
Amendments of the Law on the Asylum and Refugees (LAR), published in the State Gazette on 16.10.2015, grant the State Agency for the Refugees (SAR) the power to place asylum seekers in closed centres. Currently, the Registration and Reception Centres (RCC), managed by the SAR, have an open regime of entry and exit. The new law also enables the Chair of the SAR to determine zones on the territory of the country, which asylum seekers may not leave without permission.
At the moment, there are six open camps (RCC) functioning on the territory of the country: three in the region of Sofia (in the neighbourhoods of Vrazhdebna, Voenna Rampa and Ovcha Kupel) and one in each of the village of Banya near Nova Zagora, the village of Pastrogor and the town of Harmanli. The centre in Harmanli is the largest, with a capacity of 2710 places. The total capacity of the six centres is 5130 places. According to the SAR, as of the end of September, 2015, the centres were full to just about 50% of their total capacity. This is not due to a decrease in the flow of people, seeking asylum in Bulgaria, as their number from the beginning of the year up to the end of August, nearly 11,500, according to the SAR, exceeds significantly the number for the corresponding periods in previous years; it is, rather, the result of the trend of more and more of the registered asylum seekers, placed in the open centres, to leave Bulgaria before the completion of their asylum procedures.
| Condition: |
: . See the seller’s listing for full details and description of ... Read moreabout the condition
| Brand: ||Fendi|
| Heel Type: ||Block|| Style: ||Pumps, Classics|
| Heel Height: ||High (3 in. to 4.5 in.)|| US Shoe Size (Women's): ||7.5|
| Material: ||Leather|| Width: ||Medium (B, M)|
| Pattern: ||Solid|| Color: ||Gold|
| Country/Region of Manufacture: ||Italy|| UPC: ||Does not apply|
The bill introducing these restrictions of the freedom of movement of asylum seekers in Bulgaria transposes into Bulgarian legislation two European directives: Directive 2011/95/EU on standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection
(the Qualification Directive) and Directive 2013/33/EU laying down standards for the reception of applicants for international protection
(the Reception Conditions Directive). According to the provisions of EU law, which Bulgaria must respect, the fact that a person has asked for international protection is not sufficient grounds for restricting his or her freedom and placing him or her in a closed centre. On the other hand, the Reception Conditions Directive allows the detention of asylum seekers, but only when this is necessary as a measure of last resort in exceptional circumstances, while providing a number of legal guarantees of the rights of the detainee. It is also allowed to create zones of movement as the newly adopted Bulgarian law does, but this is only a possibility, not a requirement. Similarly, EU law allows, but does not require the detention of asylum seekers in closed centres. EU Member States are always free to provide more favourable reception conditions to asylum seekers than the minimum standards set by European law.
Even though the adopted provisions do not, on their face, contradict the requirements of EU law, there is a risk for them to be applied arbitrarily by the state authorities wanting to have control over the asylum seekers in Bulgaria. For example, the decision that it is in the interest of public order for somebody to be placed in a closed centre as a matter of prevention – i.e., when he or she has not committed an infraction of public order – is left entirely to the discretion of the respective official. These broad discretionary powers represent a serious risk factor for corruption. Regarding zones of movement, their introduction in a relatively small country like Bulgaria, which, unlike Germany, has a centralized model of government, and in which economic opportunities are concentrated in several big cities, appears unjustified, especially considering that the same bill aims at helping asylum seekers participate in the labour market by giving them the right to work after three months from the beginning of their asylum procedure.