KBEDG02 WORLDS FIRST EXPANDING DOG CAGE INTERNATIONAL Patent PCT/GB2016/052623,Genuine christian louboutin shoes size 4.5 /37.5 contrast peep toe,PETER KAISER - ERGA BRANDY SUEDE - SIZE 8 - 20,000+ F/BACK! BB155,Sexy pink/custom extreme killer 18cm high heel strappy wedge mule sandals fetish,Kurt Geiger London Burgundy Red Mustard Lizard Heels Shoes Size 5 / 38 RRP,Irregular Choice Womens Shoely Not Ankle Strap Sandals Pink (Pink) 7.5 UK,CLARKS ORINOCO JAZZ BLACK NUBUCK LEATHER 1.5" HEEL BIKER STYLE BOOTS D VGC,SEBASTIAN PROFESSIONAL WOMEN’S S6911P PITIRIBLU PUMPS/COURT SHOES BLUE,Men/Women Ermano Scervino Shoes Size 6 Outstanding features Let our goods go to the world Very practical,Christian Louboutin Tissu Etincelle So Kate heels - size /
Sergio Rossi Trelliced Leather Peep Toe Sandals Size 6 Excellent Condition,Via Spiga Ankle Strap Mule Pumps 200, Rattan, 9 UK,Christian LOUBOUTIN Bianca 140 Patent Calf Size 39.5,Louboutin : Amazing "Daffodile Gold Strass 160" pump EU40.5, US10.5, UK7.5,Men/Women Christian Louboutin Shoes Pumps Black New market Known for its good quality buy online,Christian louboutin womens peeptoe Python Aquarel shoes 36.5,Lanvin, Wedge Balerina Shoes, Brown Suede, Size 41,Yves Saint Laurent (Original Collection) Suede Pump Shoe,Gentleman/Lady Louboutin Air Chance Size 6 Shoes use Let our products go to the world Characteristics,SOPHIA WEBSTER Madame Chiara Sandal Rose Gold Size EU40 UK7 BNIB,Stuart Weitzman Russell & Bromley Snake Print Buckle Court Shoes US 9,Womens Multi-Colors Block Heel Open Toes Slingbacks Casual Summer Sandal Slipper
Sandals model 90658 Inello - Matter - Shoes,RENE CAOVILLA BNIB SIZE 37 SIZE 5 DIAMONTE PYTHON HEEL SANDALS,AUTHENTIC CHRISTIAN LOUBOUTIN STRAP PUMPS PINK GRADE A -AT,Man's/Woman's ZARA BLACK STUDDED LEATHER HIGH-HEEL SANDALS 5 US Rich design Upper material various kinds NW1477
$880 Miu Miu Sequined Open Toe High Heel Platform Sandals Sz 40.5 U.S 10.5 EUC,Paco Gil Womens P-3459 Mules Black (Black Black) 7 UK,Retro Luxury Flower Mid Block Heels Sandals Buckle Strap Womens Shoes Rhinestone,Man's/Woman's edit laterrrrrrr Special purchase Quality and quantity guaranteed Sales online store,
By Radostina Pavlova
Amendments of the Law on the Asylum and Refugees (LAR), published in the State Gazette on 16.10.2015, grant the State Agency for the Refugees (SAR) the power to place asylum seekers in closed centres. Currently, the Registration and Reception Centres (RCC), managed by the SAR, have an open regime of entry and exit. The new law also enables the Chair of the SAR to determine zones on the territory of the country, which asylum seekers may not leave without permission.
At the moment, there are six open camps (RCC) functioning on the territory of the country: three in the region of Sofia (in the neighbourhoods of Vrazhdebna, Voenna Rampa and Ovcha Kupel) and one in each of the village of Banya near Nova Zagora, the village of Pastrogor and the town of Harmanli. The centre in Harmanli is the largest, with a capacity of 2710 places. The total capacity of the six centres is 5130 places. According to the SAR, as of the end of September, 2015, the centres were full to just about 50% of their total capacity. This is not due to a decrease in the flow of people, seeking asylum in Bulgaria, as their number from the beginning of the year up to the end of August, nearly 11,500, according to the SAR, exceeds significantly the number for the corresponding periods in previous years; it is, rather, the result of the trend of more and more of the registered asylum seekers, placed in the open centres, to leave Bulgaria before the completion of their asylum procedures.
| Condition: |
: . See the seller’s listing for full details and description of ... Read moreabout the condition
| Brand: ||Fendi|
| Heel Type: ||Block|| Style: ||Pumps, Classics|
| Heel Height: ||High (3 in. to 4.5 in.)|| US Shoe Size (Women's): ||7.5|
| Material: ||Leather|| Width: ||Medium (B, M)|
| Pattern: ||Solid|| Color: ||Gold|
| Country/Region of Manufacture: ||Italy|| UPC: ||Does not apply|
The bill introducing these restrictions of the freedom of movement of asylum seekers in Bulgaria transposes into Bulgarian legislation two European directives: Directive 2011/95/EU on standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection
(the Qualification Directive) and Directive 2013/33/EU laying down standards for the reception of applicants for international protection
(the Reception Conditions Directive). According to the provisions of EU law, which Bulgaria must respect, the fact that a person has asked for international protection is not sufficient grounds for restricting his or her freedom and placing him or her in a closed centre. On the other hand, the Reception Conditions Directive allows the detention of asylum seekers, but only when this is necessary as a measure of last resort in exceptional circumstances, while providing a number of legal guarantees of the rights of the detainee. It is also allowed to create zones of movement as the newly adopted Bulgarian law does, but this is only a possibility, not a requirement. Similarly, EU law allows, but does not require the detention of asylum seekers in closed centres. EU Member States are always free to provide more favourable reception conditions to asylum seekers than the minimum standards set by European law.
Even though the adopted provisions do not, on their face, contradict the requirements of EU law, there is a risk for them to be applied arbitrarily by the state authorities wanting to have control over the asylum seekers in Bulgaria. For example, the decision that it is in the interest of public order for somebody to be placed in a closed centre as a matter of prevention – i.e., when he or she has not committed an infraction of public order – is left entirely to the discretion of the respective official. These broad discretionary powers represent a serious risk factor for corruption. Regarding zones of movement, their introduction in a relatively small country like Bulgaria, which, unlike Germany, has a centralized model of government, and in which economic opportunities are concentrated in several big cities, appears unjustified, especially considering that the same bill aims at helping asylum seekers participate in the labour market by giving them the right to work after three months from the beginning of their asylum procedure.