NIB Tory Burch Reva Ballet Flats Shoes Cobra-Embossed Black Natural 9 M,Anniel Size 40 US 9/9.5 Silver Grey Glitter Ballet Flats Ballerina Orig $235Klogs Mission - Leather Clog - Many Colors Black Tooled - 8.5 Medium,Klogs Austin Women's Leather Comfort C Black Flower Tool - 10 Medium,Ladies Remonte Extra Wide Fitting Flat Shoes D0506Schutz 316900010DLG Womens Ballet Flat- Choose SZ/Color.,AGL Attilio Giusti Leombruni Ballet Flats Shoes Leather Black size 7.5 $298,TORY BURCH CECILY Women Embellished Espadrilles Size 8 Octagon New IvoryLe Classique Chic ! Derby CHURCH'S BURWOOD 38 Cuir Taupe & Argent () ** TBEVALENTINO Black Patent Leather Derbies, US 7,Klogs Naples Mens - Womens Clogs Black Tooled - 8 Wide,Paris Hilton Shoes Women Wedges Blue 89510 BDT SALE,Clarks 2610170 9075 Womens Ashland Blush Slip On Loafers 7.5- Choose SZ/Color.,Gentlemen/Ladies BCBG Generation Women's Justine Loafer Flat Louis, elaborate Make full use of materials Exquisite (processing) processingCrocs Women's Olivia II Lined Ballet Flat - Choose SZ/Color,LADIES SHOES/FOOTWEAR - Steplite Adeline carbon multi slip on shoe,Sesto Meucci Ella Womens Flat- Choose SZ/Color.,Men/Women NEW MANGO WOMENS SLIT LEATHER SHOES Ideal gift for all occasions new Highly appreciated and widely trusted in and out,Men's/Women's SoftWalk Women's Vantage Loafer Moderate price Trendy business,JOHN FLUEVOG ANGELS SEVENTH HEAVEN LEATHER WINGTIP MARY JANE SHOES WOMEN'S 7.5,PRADA - Women's Tan & Silver Woven Corded Leather Ballet Flat Slippers 41 US 11$295 ARCHE WOMEN’S WHITE PERFORATED LEATHER BALLET FLATS 41 US 10 MADE IN FRANCE,Rieker Women's R5253 Elea 53 Fire/Schwarz Sandal 38 (US Women's 7-7.5) M,Off The Beaten Track 25918 Womens Salem - Black Smooth - 7,$229 New Club Monaco Black Hayley Pony SKINS Flats Ankle Strap Sandals Shoes 39Dirndl + bua Ballerina Low Shoes Goat Nappa Black Bix LeatherWomens Dr Martens Polley Leather Work Black Smooth Retro Buckle Flat Shoe,NEW Tory Burch Acorn Charm Smoking Slipper Loafers Shoes Borgundy Red Velvet 9Salvatore Ferragamo Suede Pointed Toe Flats, Women's - Size 10 B, Black,Womens Fly London Tram Bridle Leather Open Toe Summer Wedge Heel Shoes

   

By Radostina Pavlova

Amendments of the Law on the Asylum and Refugees (LAR), published in the State Gazette on 16.10.2015, grant the State Agency for the Refugees (SAR) the power to place asylum seekers in closed centres. Currently, the Registration and Reception Centres (RCC), managed by the SAR, have an open regime of entry and exit. The new law also enables the Chair of the SAR to determine zones on the territory of the country, which asylum seekers may not leave without permission.

At the moment, there are six open camps (RCC) functioning on the territory of the country: three in the region of Sofia (in the neighbourhoods of Vrazhdebna, Voenna Rampa and Ovcha Kupel) and one in each of the village of Banya near Nova Zagora, the village of Pastrogor and the town of Harmanli. The centre in Harmanli is the largest, with a capacity of 2710 places. The total capacity of the six centres is 5130 places. According to the SAR, as of the end of September, 2015, the centres were full to just about 50% of their total capacity. This is not due to a decrease in the flow of people, seeking asylum in Bulgaria, as their number from the beginning of the year up to the end of August, nearly 11,500, according to the SAR, exceeds significantly the number for the corresponding periods in previous years; it is, rather, the result of the trend of more and more of the registered asylum seekers, placed in the open centres, to leave Bulgaria before the completion of their asylum procedures.

Item specifics

Condition:
New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
Style: Flats
Material: 100% Leather Sole: Rubber
UPC: Does not apply Lining: 100% Leather
Occasion: Casual Brand: Clarks
The bill introducing these restrictions of the freedom of movement of asylum seekers in Bulgaria transposes into Bulgarian legislation two European directives: Directive 2011/95/EU on standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection (the Qualification Directive) and Directive 2013/33/EU laying down standards for the reception of applicants for international protection (the Reception Conditions Directive). According to the provisions of EU law, which Bulgaria must respect, the fact that a person has asked for international protection is not sufficient grounds for restricting his or her freedom and placing him or her in a closed centre. On the other hand, the Reception Conditions Directive allows the detention of asylum seekers, but only when this is necessary as a measure of last resort in exceptional circumstances, while providing a number of legal guarantees of the rights of the detainee. It is also allowed to create zones of movement as the newly adopted Bulgarian law does, but this is only a possibility, not a requirement. Similarly, EU law allows, but does not require the detention of asylum seekers in closed centres. EU Member States are always free to provide more favourable reception conditions to asylum seekers than the minimum standards set by European law.

Even though the adopted provisions do not, on their face, contradict the requirements of EU law, there is a risk for them to be applied arbitrarily by the state authorities wanting to have control over the asylum seekers in Bulgaria. For example, the decision that it is in the interest of public order for somebody to be placed in a closed centre as a matter of prevention – i.e., when he or she has not committed an infraction of public order – is left entirely to the discretion of the respective official. These broad discretionary powers represent a serious risk factor for corruption. Regarding zones of movement, their introduction in a relatively small country like Bulgaria, which, unlike Germany, has a centralized model of government, and in which economic opportunities are concentrated in several big cities, appears unjustified, especially considering that the same bill aims at helping asylum seekers participate in the labour market by giving them the right to work after three months from the beginning of their asylum procedure.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply